 | 명사 | 그 무수한 봄날 |
| 희귀도 |  |
| 유형 | 광추, 공허 광추 |
| 운명의 길 |  공허 |
| 설명 | 공허 운명의 길 전용 광추. 광추 스킬은 해당 운명의 길에만 적용된다 |
| 전투 스킬 | 장착한 캐릭터의 효과 명중이 60% 증가하고, 장착한 캐릭터가 일반 공격, 전투 스킬, 필살기를 발동해 적을 공격하면 60%의 기본 확률로 해당 목표를 [무장해제] 상태에 빠트린다. [무장해제] 상태의 적은 받는 피해가 10% 증가한다, 지속 시간: 2턴. 목표가 장착한 캐릭터가 부여한 지속 피해 상태일 시 60%의 기본 확률로 장착한 캐릭터가 부여한 [무장해제] 상태가 [궁지 몰이] 상태로 업그레이드되며, 적이 받는 피해가 추가로 14% 증가한다, 지속 시간: 2턴, 지속 시간 동안 장착한 캐릭터는 해당 목표에게 [무장해제]를 부여할 수 없다 |
| 전용 재료 |  385K 20 4 12 20 15 14 |
| 스토리 | 몇 차례 소나기가 지나자 봄의 조수가 차오르고 푸른 새싹이 자라났다.
「이게 몇 번째 봄이지?」
그는 처음 전장에 뛰어들었던 젊은 전사들을 떠올렸다. 해마다 다른 사람들이었지만, 희망과 활기로 가득 찬 모습은 전부 같았다.
버드나무 가지를 꺾으며 돌아오기를 기다렸지만, 그들이 고향으로 가지고 온 것은… 영원히 녹지 않을 얼음서리였다.
지저귀는 새소리에 그는 두 눈을 감았고, 나뭇잎 사이로 비치는 햇빛이 얼굴을 덮었다.
——「역시 남겨진 사람이 가장 외롭구나」 |
26 responses to “그 무수한 봄날”
Is the debuff provided by this lc considered as vulnerability or a separate multiplier?
The clue is in the wording. There are two wordings that look as if they can be vulnerability. But only one of the two are.
Adventurine and Topaz have a debuff (Topaz’s is in her LC.) where it states. “When allies attack an enemy with debuff, damage dealt is increased by %.” This debuff is additive with other damage % increases. Elemental/basic/skill/ult ect ect.
While Jiaoqiu’s tech debuff states. “Increased damage received by the enemy.”
This LC also states. “Increased damage received by the enemy.” So it’s 100% the same Vulnerability debuff. His E1 however states “Allies deal 40% increased damage.” So it’s additive with Elemental/basic/skill/ult buffs.
Oh, Aventurine and Topaz debuff stacks with crit damage. Not elemental. But normally “Damage is increased.” is elemental. Unless it states otherwise like theirs do. Aka “Deals increased crit damage.”
Thank you, that was a nice explanation with examples as well
As a Guinaifen main, I will not stop pulling for this thing until either S5 or the end of the banner. I already have the mats to fully ascend it.
is it 10% PLUS 14%
or
10% becoming 14% (essentially 10 plus 4)
“…which ADDITIONALLY increases the DMG the target enemy receives by 14%…” – so, it’s 10%+14% I think
It is 10% plus 14%.
Since the V4 made no updates to this light cone, my conclusion does not change and I’m still planning to get this for Guinaifen. I’m sharing this for fellows and potential fellows who would do the same like me.
———-
TL;DR
Guinaifen /w Jiaoqiu’s signature build:
1. EHR% body is recommended over atk% body, other main stats need not change;
2. 138.1% EHR is recommended (24.9% EHR from substats);
3. Attack% and speed are still effective substats and the more the better.
The impact:
1. Gui has ~23.7% fewer opportunity on personal damage;
2. 16%~19% damage increment for the rest of the team.
———-
Q: Why 138.1% EHR?
A: Gui substrats 10% effect res from enemies, meaning she only need 108.4% / 138.1% EHR to charantee the light cone’s effect vs. enemies with 30% / 40% effect res. With 10% EHR from substats, 60% from light cone, and 43.2% from main stats, Gui’s EHR already surpasses the first threshold, and she only needs 24.9% more EHR to reach the second threshold.
———-
Q: What’s the impact of the light cone on Gui?
A: Gui’s personal damage becomes less potent for the build, since she has no opportunity to wield an atk% body, meaning 43.2% fewer attack thus ~24% fewer final attack stat. She also has no opportunity to wield the 4-star nihility light cones that give either 48% damage amp for DoT or 72% damage amp. Let’s take the GNASW as an example.
Build 1: S5 GNASW, prisoner 4pc + glamoth 2pc, atk% body, atk% rope, speed boots, fire damage orb.
Attack: (582 + 476) * (1 + 0.12 * 2 + 0.432 * 2) + 352.7 = 2578.732
Damage amp: 1 + 0.2 + 0.224 + 0.388 + 0.72 = 2.532
Damage vulnerability (firekiss 3 stacks): 1 + 0.076 * 3 = 1.228
Build 2: S1 Jiaoqiu’s signature, EHR% body, and the rest are the same.
Attack: (582 + 582) * (1 + 0.12 * 2 + 0.432) + 352.7 = 2298.908
Damage amp: 1 + 0.2 + 0.224 + 0.388 = 1.812
Damage vulnerability (firekiss 3 stacks): 1 + 0.24 + 0.076 * 3 = 1.468
Damage impact: (2298.908 * 1.812 * 1.468) / (2578.732 * 2.532 * 1.228) ≈ 76.3%
That’s said, Gui loses ~23.7% of her personal damage from DoT. (The percentage can be slightly lower if your Gui had higher attack and damage amp than the calculations above.)
However, the vulnerability is a teamwide bonus, meaning ~19.5% damage increment for the whole team, or ~16.2% damage increment if the damage benefits from Black Swan’s ultimate. (The percentage can be slightly lower if you had Kafka’s E1.)
Gui’s personal damage has never been a major portion of the DoT comp, and using Jiaoqiu’s signature on her is something like trading 23.7% of her personal damage for 16%~19% damage increment for the rest of the team.
My personal relic plans on her:
1. Messenger 2pc, Forge 2pc, leading to +12% speed;
2. EHR% body, speed boots, atk% / ERR rope, atk% / fire damage orb;
3. The speed shall surpass Kafka with signature fully stacked (~14 rolls on speed);
4. EHR% reachs 138.1% (~7 rolls on EHR).
My Kafka has 160.7 speed outside of battle.
106 * 1.12 + 25 + substats >= 160.7 + 4.8 * 3
substats >= 31.38
That’s ~14 rolls on speed.